fix: rebuild MES as compilable go-zero+ent backend (renamed bj_power_mes), restore 3 workstation projects from pristine original, align naming; all Go projects go build clean

2026-08-27 10:56:41 +08:00
parent 380715f8a9
commit 371b494c54
523 changed files with 67923 additions and 24758 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
+# Chat Export
+
+**Model:** deepseek-v4-pro
+**Workspace:** F:\Workspace\Hardman\back_cover
+**Date:** 2026-05-10 00:57:31
+
+---
+
+*System:*
+
+Created AGENTS.md at F:\Workspace\Hardman\back_cover\AGENTS.md
+
+Edit this file to customize agent behavior for your project.
+
+---
+
+*System:*
+
+Error: AGENTS.md already exists. Delete it first to reinitialize.
+
+---
+
+**You:**
+
+使用中文对话、思考、写文档
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+The user wants me to use Simplified Chinese for conversation, thinking, and documentation. Let me first understand the project structure - it's a Go project called "back_cover" (后盖).
+
+Let me start by surveying the project to understand what we're working with. I'll read the key files and explore the structure.
+
+---
+
+**Assistant:**
+
+好的，我先了解一下项目结构。
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done
+▏ name: list_dir
+▏ result: <39 items>
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done
+▏ name: read_file
+▏ result: # Project Instructions
+▏ 
+▏ 6 lines omitted; Alt+V for details
+▏ - Test: `go test ./...`
+▏ - Ru...
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done
+▏ name: read_file
+▏ result: # CLAUDE.md
+▏ 
+▏ This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
+▏ 3 lines omitted; Alt+V for details
+▏ **小型产品测量单元管控系统** — 自动化制造单元 CNC 产线管控系统。控制西门子 P
+▏ LC 驱动的...
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done · Reading go.mod
+▏ done: Reading go.mod
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+This is a comprehensive Go project - a "小型产品测量单元管控系统" (Small Product Measurement Unit Control System) for automated manufacturing cells with CNC production lines. The project uses go-zero framework, ent ORM, PostgreSQL, and controls Siemens PLC-driven production lines.
+
+The user wants me to use Simplified Chinese for conversation, thinking, and documentation. Let me now understand the current state of the project better by looking at some key areas.
+
+Let me check the cmd directory and the main entry points.
+
+---
+
+**Assistant:**
+
+项目是一个 **小型产品测量单元管控系统**（液压马达后盖 CNC 产线自动化管控），基于 Go + go-zero + ent + PostgreSQL。结构清晰，架构文档完善。
+
+让我进一步看看关键入口和目录结构。
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done
+▏ name: list_dir
+▏ result: <2 items>
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done
+▏ name: list_dir
+▏ result: <27 items>
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done · Reading hougai.go
+▏ done: Reading hougai.go
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+I now have a good understanding of the project. It's a comprehensive Go project for automated manufacturing cell control. The user said "使用中文对话、思考、写文档" - meaning use Chinese for conversation, thinking, and documentation.
+
+There's no specific task yet - the user just set the language preference. Let me provide a brief overview of what I see and ask if they have a specific task in mind.
+
+Actually, looking at the conversation more carefully, the user didn't ask me to do anything specific yet. They just set language preferences. Let me provide a concise project overview in Chinese and ask what they'd like me to work on.
+
+---
+
+**Assistant:**
+
+已完整浏览项目结构。总结如下：
+
+**项目**: 华德后盖零件自动化生产线管控系统（`hougai`）
+
+- **语言**: Go 1.25.0 + go-zero v1.8.3 + ent ORM v0.14.5
+- **数据库**: PostgreSQL 127.0.0.1:5432，库 `back_cover`
+- **前端**: React 19 + Semi Design UI + Vite 7（`frontend/`，构建产物嵌入 Go 二进制）
+- **平台**: Windows 系统托盘桌面应用
+- **核心**: 西门子 PLC（S7 协议）+ FANUC CNC（FOCAS）+ 工业机器人控制的自动化产线引擎
+
+**核心模块** (`internal/`):
+- `eventloop/` — DB SSOT 单线程事件循环（生产线核心调度）
+- `processor/` — 作业处理器（工序编排、状态机、调度）
+- `scheduler/` — 三层调度器（Generator/Filter/Policy）
+- `station/` — 工站系统（CNC、清洗机、清洗线等）
+- `robot/` — 机器人动作控制（PLC 信号交互）
+- `recovery/` — 断点恢复系统
+
+CLAUDE.md 里有超过 200 行的详细架构文档，覆盖了所有关键子系统。
+
+你想让我做什么？是要修改某个模块、添加功能、排查问题还是其他？
+
+---
+
+**You:**
+
+NewProductionEventLoop有用吗
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+The user is asking whether `NewProductionEventLoop` is useful/functional. Let me look at how it's created, used, and whether the Command handlers are actually routed. From the CLAUDE.md, I recall there's a note: "eventloop 的 Command 类 handler（StartOrder/PauseOrder/...）尚未路由——API 控制命令仍走旧 JobProcessor 路径". Let me verify this by reading the actual code.
+
+---
+
+**Assistant:**
+
+好问题。让我直接看代码——`NewProductionEventLoop` 的创建、消息处理和实际使用情况。
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done
+▏ name: list_dir
+▏ result: <5 items>
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done
+▏ name: read_file
+▏ result: package eventloop
+▏ 
+▏ 10 lines omitted; Alt+V for details
+▏ 
+▏ // ProductionEventLoop 产线事件循环：唯一生产状态写路径，串行处理所...
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done
+▏ name: read_file
+▏ result: package eventloop
+▏ 
+▏ 7 lines omitted; Alt+V for details
+▏ 	CmdStartOrder          MessageType = "START_ORDER"
+▏ 	CmdPauseOrder          Me...
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ⌕ find done
+▏ name: grep_files
+▏ result: <4 keys>
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• ▷ read done · 3 items
+▏ done: Reading internal/svc/service_context.go
+▏ done: Reading internal/eventloop/worker.go
+▏ done: Searching for `EventLoop|eventLoop`
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+Now let me look at the event loop implementation to see what `NewProductionEventLoop` does and how messages are handled.
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+Now I have a clear picture. Let me analyze the current state of `NewProductionEventLoop`:
+
+**What it creates:**
+- A `ProductionEventLoop` with a DBState (ent-based atomic updates), msgCh (256 cap), worker, runtime snapshots, and callbacks.
+
+**What it actually does (the useful parts):**
+1. **ExternalEvent handling — fully implemented:**
+   - `EvtMachineDone` → `handleMachineDone` — batch/single slot completion, updates DB slots, transitions jobs to waiting unload
+   - `EvtInspectionResult` → `handleInspectionResult` — pass/fail handling, advance step or scrap + alarm
+2. **WorkerResult handling — fully implemented:**
+   - Robot/tool/machine start results → `handleWorkerResult` — marks tasks success/failed, advances job or suspends + alarm
+3. **Periodic scheduling** — `trySchedule` refreshes job runtime snapshots every 30s
+4. **DBState** — atomic conditional updates (ClaimJobForAction, MoveJobToEquipment, etc.)
+5. **RecoverOnStartup** — used in ServiceContext startup
+6. **Callbacks** — SSE bridge for state changes, alarm events, machine done forwarding to JobProcessor
+
+**What's NOT implemented (stub handlers):**
+- All 9 Command handlers: StartOrder, PauseOrder, ResumeOrder, CancelOrder, SuspendJob, ResumeJob, ReworkJob, ConfirmRecovery, ResolveManualAction → all return "not yet routed"
+- External events: PalletArrived, StepTimeout, RefillRequested → only log warnings
+
+**How it's actually used:**
+- SignalWatcher → `eventLoop.Send(EvtMachineDone)` and `eventLoop.Send(EvtInspectionResult)` — these ARE routed
+- `eventLoop.Run(ctx)` is started as a goroutine
+- `RecoverOnStartup` is called from the DBState (which eventLoop wraps)
+- `eventLoop.SetOnMachineDone` forwards to `orderProcessor.OnMachineDone` — so machine done flows through event loop first (slot state update), then back to JobProcessor for scheduling
+
+**Key insight:** The SignalWatcher → event loop → JobProcessor path IS working. The event loop handles the "state write" part (DB slot updates) synchronously in its single-threaded loop, then delegates scheduling back to JobProcessor. This is a partial but functional migration.
+
+The "not yet routed" Command handlers mean the event loop is NOT the write path for API-initiated operations — those still go through the old JobProcessor path. But for the hardware signal → state transition path, the event loop IS useful and functioning.
+
+Let me also check if `onMachineDone` is actually set in the service context — yes, I saw it:
+```go
+eventLoop.SetOnMachineDone(func(machineID int) {
+    orderProcessor.OnMachineDone(machineID)
+})
+```
+
+So the answer is: Yes, `NewProductionEventLoop` IS useful — it handles the hardware signal path (machine done, inspection result, worker results) with proper DB state writes. The Command path (API control commands) is not yet routed through it — those still go through the old `JobProcessor`. But the signal-to-state pipeline is a real, functioning migration.
+
+Let me verify by also checking if there are any usages of eventLoop in API handlers.
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+Both handler and logic directories have zero references to EventLoop. This confirms: API commands don't go through the event loop at all.
+
+Now I have a complete picture. Let me summarize the answer for the user.
+
+---
+
+**Assistant:**
+
+结论很清楚。**`NewProductionEventLoop` 有用，但只走了一半。**
+
+---
+
+### 实际生效的路径（3 条）
+
+| 路径 | 流程 | 状态 |
+|------|------|------|
+| **设备完成信号** | `SignalWatcher` → `eventLoop.Send(EvtMachineDone)` → `handleMachineDone`（批量/单信号，写 DB 槽位状态，job → WaitingUnload）→ 回调 `orderProcessor.OnMachineDone` 触发调度 | 完整运行 |
+| **检测结果信号** | `SignalWatcher` → `eventLoop.Send(EvtInspectionResult)` → `handleInspectionResult`（合格推进步骤 / 不合格报警+Scrapped） | 完整运行 |
+| **Worker 执行结果** | `HardwareWorker.Execute` 完成 → `eventLoop.Send(ResRobotActionSucceeded/...)` → `handleWorkerResult`（标记 task 成功/失败，推进 job 或挂起+报警） | 完整运行 |
+
+还有 30s 定时 `trySchedule` 刷新 `jobRuntimes` 快照，以及启动时的 `RecoverOnStartup`。
+
+---
+
+### 未实现的路径（9 个 Command 全部是桩）
+
+```go
+// loop.go 末尾 — 全部返回 "not yet routed"
+func (l *ProductionEventLoop) handleStartOrder(...)    { l.reply(msg, false, "not yet routed", nil) }
+func (l *ProductionEventLoop) handlePauseOrder(...)    { l.reply(msg, false, "not yet routed", nil) }
+func (l *ProductionEventLoop) handleResumeOrder(...)   { l.reply(msg, false, "not yet routed", nil) }
+func (l *ProductionEventLoop) handleCancelOrder(...)   { l.reply(msg, false, "not yet routed", nil) }
+func (l *ProductionEventLoop) handleSuspendJob(...)    { l.reply(msg, false, "not yet routed", nil) }
+func (l *ProductionEventLoop) handleResumeJob(...)     { l.reply(msg, false, "not yet routed", nil) }
+func (l *ProductionEventLoop) handleReworkJob(...)     { l.reply(msg, false, "not yet routed", nil) }
+func (l *ProductionEventLoop) handleConfirmRecovery(...) { l.reply(msg, false, "not yet routed", nil) }
+func (l *ProductionEventLoop) handleResolveManualAction(...) { l.reply(msg, false, "not yet routed", nil) }
+```
+
+API handler/logic 层 **完全没有任何** `EventLoop` 引用——Command 路径全部走旧的 `JobProcessor`（`OrderProcessorInterface`），跟 event loop 是两条平行线。
+
+---
+
+### 总结
+
+`NewProductionEventLoop` 当前是 **半个引擎**：
+
+- **信号→状态** 这条链路已经迁移完成，是真正的 DB SSOT 写路径（单线程串行，ent 条件更新）。
+- **API→控制** 这条链路还是旧的 `JobProcessor`，event loop 的 Command handler 全是桩，也没人调 `Send(CmdStartOrder)`。
+
+设计意图是最终把所有写路径都收敛到 event loop，但目前只完成了硬件信号侧。如果现在删掉它，设备完成信号和检测结果就没人处理了——所以 **有用，不能删**。
+
+---
+
+**You:**
+
+生成git提交信息
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• • tool done
+▏ name: git_status
+▏ result: ## master
+▏  M etc/hougai-api.yaml
+▏  M internal/processor/job_processor.go
+▏  M internal/processor/job_runtime.go
+▏ 2 lines omitted; Alt+V for details
+▏ ?? AGENTS.md
+▏ ?? docs/superpowers/plans...
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+用户想要我生成一个 git 提交信息。让我先看看当前的 git 状态——有哪些改动。
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• • tool done
+▏ name: git_diff
+• ◆ patch done · 1 file +0 -0
+summary: 1 file, +0 -0, 1 hunk
+etc/hougai-api.yaml +0 -0 1 hunk
+diff --git a/etc/hougai-api.yaml b/etc/hougai-api.yaml
+index 50ad6a4..44bb870 100644
+--- a/etc/hougai-api.yaml
+++ b/etc/hougai-api.yaml
+@@ -41,4 +41,4 @@ Marking:
+  41   41   BaseURL: "...
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+Let me also check the git log to understand the commit style used in this project.
+
+---
+
+**Tool:**
+
+• • tool done · max_count: 10
+▏ name: git_log
+▏ result: 30a32b6da4bf7e7e27b94623a9e8ec3dcc13c28d
+▏ Author: wangcheng <3316148@qq.com>
+▏ 3 lines omitted; Alt+V for details
+▏ 
+▏ d48fb8ec82690bb9...
+
+---
+
+*Thinking:*
+
+Now I have a clear picture of the changes. Let me summarize:
+
+**Modified files:**
+1. `etc/hougai-api.yaml` — Mock.Enable: true → false（关闭模拟模式，切换到真实硬件）
+2. `internal/processor/job_processor.go` — 三处改动：
+   - 删除 `onTaskComplete` 中的过时注释
+   - **核心修复**: `TryClaimForExchange` 换料配对逻辑增强——除了 `WAITING_STATION`，也接受 `RUNNING + OnBuffer` 的 Job（解决 RescheduleStep 提前推进导致的只下料不上料问题）。队列遍历方式从 pop-front 改为 index-based 删除。
+   - `HasWaitingForMachine` 改为只检查真正 WAITING_STATION 状态的 Job（之前只检查队列长度）
+3. `internal/processor/job_runtime.go` — 在 `syncStatusToDB` 中加了 debug 日志
+4. `test/main.go` — 测试 IP 从 192.168.2.120 改为 192.168.1.120
+
+The commit style follows: `type(scope): description` in Chinese. Let me generate appropriate commit messages.
+
+Based on the changes, the main fix is the exchange pairing logic. Let me write a commit message.
+
+---
+
+**Assistant:**
+
+根据 diff 内容，改动集中在换料配对的 bug 修复上。以下是对应的提交信息：
+
+---
+
+```
+fix(processor): 换料配对兼容 RUNNING+OnBuffer 状态，避免只下料不上料
+
+RescheduleStep 会在 WAITING_STATION→RUNNING 后提前入队 LOAD 任务，
+但 UNLOAD（High 优先级）先于 LOAD（Normal）执行，LOAD 尚未将状态切回
+WAITING_STATION。原逻辑只匹配 WAITING_STATION 状态的 Job，导致 LOAD
+的 Job 被跳过，换料只下料不上料。
+
+改动：
+- TryClaimForExchange：除 WAITING_STATION 外，也接受 RUNNING + OnBuffer
+  的 Job，队列遍历改为 index-based（避免错误跳过非队首的可配对 Job）
+- HasWaitingForMachine：改为检查队列中是否真有 WAITING_STATION 的 Job，
+  而非仅判断队列长度
+- onTaskComplete：清理过时注释
+- syncStatusToDB：添加 DB 同步 debug 日志
+- 关闭 Mock 模式，切回真实硬件
+```
+
+---
+
+需要我执行 `git add` + `git commit` 吗？还是你只想自己用这段信息？
+
+---
+